News

True lies?

Many school teachers still skeptical of Arnold’s promises

by

comment

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger arrived at Sinsheimer Elementary School in SLO fashionably late, by an hour at least.

BIG MAN ON CAMPUS :  Republican incumbent Arnold Schwarzenegger greets a lively crowd of supporters at his June 14 appearance at San Luis Obispo’s Sinsheimer Elementary. - PHOTO BY JESSE ACOSTA
  • PHOTO BY JESSE ACOSTA
  • BIG MAN ON CAMPUS : Republican incumbent Arnold Schwarzenegger greets a lively crowd of supporters at his June 14 appearance at San Luis Obispo’s Sinsheimer Elementary.

# California’s celebrity governor stepped out of a heavily escorted limousine and moseyed past a deafening welcome party amassed in the school courtyard. Guided by aides, Schwarzenegger followed a carefully laid photo-op trail through campus, greeting supporters along the way. While addressing a class of young bohemians—several visually confounded by the ruckus—the governor made a few curious additions to a mosaic of California poppies.

Art teacher Bonnie Johnson suddenly interrupted, “One important thing about art is that it’s…� “Never perfect,� some of the children responded.

After a few minutes, the procession trailed off to a classroom where bright-eyed honor student Ariana Shakibnia, along with school and district administrators, welcomed the honored guest.

“All of us are extremely proud to have Gov. Schwarzenegger here and we really appreciate his demonstration of support to fine arts, music and physical education,� Sinsheimer principal Joyce Hunter said. “For several years our school district and many others in the state incurred budget cuts that affected these programs.�

One moment. Is this not the same California governor who sent the California Teachers Association (CTA) into a snapping-and-clawing frenzy during the November special election season? Is this not the same bottom-line politician who, just seven months earlier, attempted to defer teacher’s pensions, slash at the union’s political bankrolls, and repeal school spending guarantees?

At most, a score of anti-Arnold protestors lined up on the sidewalk down Augusta Street, brandishing signs in support of Democratic challenger Phil Angelides. By all other accounts, the affair proved a jovial visit for the incumbent; his embattled status notably diminished of late. Even with an education-oriented crowd in attendance, last fall’s pariah seemed the summer’s prodigal son.

“I think I never really had a problem with teachers—that was a misunderstanding,� Schwarzenegger said, brushing off his previous run-in with the powerful CTA union. “It’s really interesting that every year is different. Last year everyone was fighting, and this year everyone is getting along.�

Perhaps it’s not quite that serendipitous. The lubricant in this transition: funding, and plenty of it.

The turnabout arrived with a campaign caravan to bolster education funding in the pending budget, now that the economy appears to be on the mend. Under Schwarzenegger’s proposed allocation, education programs would enjoy an unprecedented $55.1 billion in state funding. The governor’s appearance at the local school, however, came with an aesthetic flair, as he proudly unveiled $416 million earmarked specifically for hiring and training fine arts teachers and another $250 million in block grants for one-time supply upgrades.

“For the first year (since I’ve been governor) we’ve seen great revenues, we’ve seen business booming, and we’re seeing the economy coming back,� Schwarzenegger said. “Now we can afford [the budget increase] and also pay off the debt in the State of California.�

In May alone, the California economy netted 14,800 additional payroll jobs—almost a fifth of the gross national gain—as traditional industries continue to writhe with rediscovered signs of life. And, with the real estate market leveling off—a force accounting for 11 percent of the economic output in the dark days of 2005—this fiscal jolt came as timely news for the governor. One day in early May, Schwarzenegger discovered an unanticipated $7.5 billion in the state coffers and promptly offered the budget revision.

But not all teachers are willing to forgive and forget the disagreements of the past. In the halls of local K-12 and community college campuses, some educators, though pleased with the governor’s change of policy, stayed skeptical of his promises. The principle concern, for most, remains whether Schwarzenegger’s education empathy will endure through election season and beyond.

Allan Hancock College and San Luis Obispo Coastal Unified (SLCU) teacher John Ashbaugh credited Schwarzenegger for the education budget bump, but expressed lingering distrust over the special election and two years of “starvation budgeting.�

“The biggest problem is the uncertainty,� Ashbaugh said. “He’s certainly a political animal and we never know which Schwarzenegger is going to show up.�

Among a long list of teachers’ gripes, ill will over funds withheld through a suspension of a Prop. 98 mechanism in 2004 remains a point of contention, along with Schwarzenegger’s track record of budget trimming.

Then, of course, there’s the usual bucket full of semantics. In regard to the $5 billion recently tagged for education above and beyond Prop. 98 requirements, Schwarzenegger proclaimed the move an affirmation of his education-friendly agenda. The unions, meanwhile, called it restitution.

“It’s important to remember, this is a repayment of debt owed to schools,� CTA spokesman Mike Myslinski said of the settlement. “It’s significant and it helps move us forward, but we should build on this.�

As a result of a lawsuit with CTA, settled by Schwarzenegger about the same time as the announcement of the budget revision, school districts will see $2 billion this year out of the $5 million in lost Prop. 98 funds, and the remainder over the next seven budget terms.

More importantly, however, education groups feel the governor’s push to delineate funding for particular purposes takes away individual districts’ control over discretionary spending. A dependence on block grants and earmarked funds in the proposed budget—an element Schwarzenegger asserts will augment transparency—would leave district administrators with little control over the new money.

Rick Pratt, Executive Director of the California School Boards Association, specifically raised issues with the plan to allocate money to appointed school site councils, rather than elected boards.

Several local school board members echoed the lobbyist’s objection. SLCU Board President Patty Andreen argued that the needs of her district differ somewhat dramatically from the governor’s sweeping allocations.

“We already place a huge priority on arts and physical education—our focus is more on narrowing the achievement gap,� Andreen said, referring to plans to bolster special education and counseling programs like AVID. “Too much earmarking might end up not curing inequity but actually accentuating it.�

But not all local educators approached by New Times voiced concern over Schwarzenegger’s intentions. SLCU Superintendent Ed Valentine called the governor’s budget encouraging and expressed confidence the move represents a definite change in policy, if not a change in heart.

“If you picture a 180-degree swing one way and then another turnaround in November—I think that would hurt Schwarzenegger more than anyone,� Valentine speculated.

In past years, controversial budget cuts delayed the state legislature’s passing of the fiscal plan by several months. Once again this year, the oft-ridiculed June 15 deadline came and went with no new budget. The snare this time—Republican dissent over a program offering state-funded healthcare to illegal residents. ∆

Patrick M. Klemz can be reached at pklemz@newtimesslo.com.

Tags

Add a comment